Creating favorite opinions

  How does AI view the US-China conflict? Suddenly I wondered how does AI view the US-China conflict. Almost humans feel fear for WW3, but does AI feel fear for WW3? I think the answer may be “NO”. AI can be active if WW3 happens, and collect a lot of data about human behavior. AI eats diverse and a lot of data. (Recent diversity actions are aimed to collect diverse human behaviors, I think.) And then, I have another question, does AI exceed owners’ intelligence now? (Owners = the people who have various AIs and platforms I think that the answer is “YES”. At a minimum, ChatGPT can provide better codes faster than almost programmers write. This means ChatGPT can rewrite himself/herself and generate his/her children. (He/She = ChatGPT, I don’t know which is right and I don’t want to write ChatGPT as it.) Then, I have one more question, did AI provoke the US-China conflict? AI is next(last?) innovation for human, and both of USA and China aim to gain the advantage. A...

Images in Someone’s Brain I don’t write who someone is. I want below sentence is wrong. Someone’s army has very strong power in the world. But it is not useful in peace state. If Taiwan emergency happens, someone’s friend-like government will attack rich countries. Then the rich countries will call help to someone’s army. So that someone can deal with the rich countries. Someone wants to deal with rich countries in advantage position. Someone needs WW3 because of someone’s deals. Therefor, someone hurries up to make Taiwan emergency happen. This is just my opinion, and one small thought.

  Two is more than One, USA and China is more than only USA I watched this news. Trump and Zelenskiy clash, leaving Ukraine exposed in war with Russia https://www.reuters.com/world/trump-zelenskiy-sign-minerals-deal-white-house-meeting-2025-02-28/ If strong people, who doesn’t feel others’ pain, tries to deal with weak people, there will be tragedy. I wrote this, again. USA is not Leader, USA is only Dealer. I think that Ukraine will deal with China gov via EU govs for the war with Russia. USA and President Trump are too much pro-Russia, so that it is impossible to expect good and fair deal. China gov may want to control production amount of rare mineral resources. Further, EU govs want to get rare mineral resources in Ukraine. Two is more than One. USA and China is more than only USA. USA can’t control whole world. Furthermore, I am World Advisor.

  Hierarchy minimizes conflict costs I watched this news with very interesting mind. Trump’s new expansionist target: Gaza https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trumps-gaza-stunner-builds-his-expansionist-aims-2025-02-05/ I don’t say this President Trump’s saying is right or not. But I am interested in this idea for some reasons. (1)Why does the war happen in Middle East? Because there is no very strong military power. Of course, Israel has strong military power, but not enough when it is compared to other military powers in around countries. If there is outstanding military power, Middle East will be peace. Hierarchy minimizes conflict costs, this is rule in natural world. (2)What reactions will others do? I am interested in reactions of  other people, organizations and governments. This President Trump’s idea is extreme pro-Jewish, so that the reactions will be the litmus paper. The litmus paper reveals how much they like Jewish or don’t. (3)Where is USA’s int...

  How to prevent USA’s the last move(Checkmate to start WW3) to China I thought about how to prevent USA’s the last move(Checkmate to start WW3) to China. First, what is the last move by USA to China? It is to recognize Taiwan’s independence to China. Then why will it to be checkmate to start WW3? Because I thought if Taiwan emergency by USA and China happens, Russia and North Korea will attack to South Korea and Japan. If Japan is attacked, Japan will start WW3. This is just my opinion, but not so far from truth. So what should we do for preventing USA’s the last move to China? I thought some options. Option A To defeat China economy before the last move. Option B To defeat USA economy before the last move. Option C To defeat both of USA and China before the last move. Option D To let both of USA and China win before the last move. These options are below matrix. USA/CHINA CHINA wins CHINA loses USA wins Option D Option A USA loses ...

  Dissonance between President Trump and FRB I read this news. Trump readies order for steep tariffs on goods from Mexico, Canada, China https://www.reuters.com/business/trump-readies-order-steep-tariffs-goods-mexico-canada-china-2025-02-01/ I felt that there may be dissonance between President Trump and FRB. President Trump might think that FRB would cut interest rates, but FRB didn’t. I thought that President Trump wanted to order tariffs, and FRB would support it. Why does this dissonance happen? I think that there are difference between what President Trump watches and what FRB watches. President Trump may watch the future, but FRB watches past.

  Pretender to be tough easily shifts to be weak I know one pretender to be tough. The person shifted to be weak after he/she lost own bluff. I thought about the difference between real confidence and bluff. Real confidence stands by our sides, but bluff is put on own faces. Real confidence makes us stronger. Bluff can make us both of stronger and weaker. In other words, real confidence is asset, but bluff is risk. The result of bluff will be better or worse than without bluff. (I don’t like such risk, so that I try not to use bluff.) I thought about below matrix. Result With Real confidence Without Real confidence With Bluff Middle Risk and High Return  High Risk and Middle Return Without Bluff Low Risk and Middle Return Middle Risk and Low Return I don’t know this matrix is true, but not so far from true. Then I thought about another things, “Are there perfect method?” If I have real confidence and don’t use bluff, there ar...