Creating favorite opinions

  Caution:Foreign intelligence agencies may work harder in Far East Asia I watched this Korea news. South Korean leader's security chief warns against violent attempts to arrest Yoon https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/south-korean-presidential-security-chief-appear-questioning-by-police-friday-2025-01-10/ Then I watched Japanese famous talent’s scandal. The scandal may be aimed to damage the conservative media Fuji-Sankei Holding. I don’t know what truth is. However, I think that both of the Korea news and the scandal news may be set up by foreign intelligence agencies. Because the timing was too good for some foreign governments, including Russia and North Korea. The relationship between Russia and North Korea may be deeper than I thought.

  Warning to Iran:Don’t rush to the war Some Iran people may read my blog. So that there is one warning. If you don’t have the solution which your enemy doesn’t think, don’t rush to war. Israel will keep on irritating Iran, but don’t let yourself rush to war. My idea I thought one idea for Iran. How about making Semi-alliance between Iran-North Korea-Pakistan?

  TPP can stop the WW3 Background TPP(Trans-Pacific Partnership) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Pacific_Partnership TPP is the trade agreement around Pacific Rim. Background2 USA and China have the conflict between them. This conflict has possibility about WW3. Can USA vs China turn to be USA & China? I hope Yes. It will be solved by USA and China to join TPP at the same time. TPP has rules about the trade agreements. If USA rejoins the TPP, China will be denied to join the TPP. If China joins the TPP, USA will be denied to join the TPP. So that if USA and China join TPP at the same time, this problem will be solved. Then if USA want to leave TPP, USA can’t rejoin the TPP because of the presence of China. The reverse is also true. TPP can bring USA and China bigger trades. More abstracted TPP is one example. There are some rules about the group just like TPP. Both = USA and China (1)There are benefits for both countries by joining the group. (2)T...

Rules and Power Rules and Power Background I thought about treaty of mutual cooperation and security between the United States and Japan(US-JP Treaty). Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between the United States and Japan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Mutual_Cooperation_and_Security_between_the_United_States_and_Japan I concerned about “in the territories under the administration of Japan” includes Taiwan or not. I don’t think the territories includes Taiwan. But I know Chinese people take Taiwan as China for granted. Rules are protected by Power Almost all rules are protected by power. If someone breaks the rules, he/she will be attacked by power. If one side breaks US-JP treaty, what will happen? If US breaks US-JP treaty, JP will protest to US. If JP breaks US-JP treaty, what will US do? I don’t want to imagine the result, and I don’t know what US will do to Japan. Taiwan’s option (A)If Taiwan people want US army to protect, Taiwan has to be...

  Hidden messages from EU’s fear for Russia Background I saw this news. China says it will never accept 'unfounded accusations' at NATO summit https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-says-it-will-never-accept-unfounded-accusations-nato-summit-2024-07-12/ Thoughts from quotes Desire is opposition feeling from fear. NATO wants China to increase the influence to Russia. What this means is NATO feels fear to Russia being uncontrollable. Think about Russia Russia seems not want to conflict with USA directly and want China to represent anti-USA. Moreover, Russia seems to want to be supporter for anti-USA & EU. Chess Russia has many strong chess players. Comparing this to chess, China is King and Russia is Queen. Queen has high mobility and can move vertical, horizontal and diagonal. Russia likes to move horizontal and alternately, so that first is Ukraine, second is East Asia, third is EU(?). I think Russian people think like this. To ride this thinking, C...

Flow economy and Stock economy Introduction Flow is some kind of change in the world. Stock is result which is caused by flow. Current world seems to be divided by 4 types of economy. Types of economy Rich Flow Poor Flow Rich Stock (A) (B) Poor Stock (C) (D) Type (A) economy has rich flow and rich stock:USA and EU. Type (B) economy has poor flow and rich stock:Japan. Type (C) economy has rich flow and poor stock:China, Russia, India, Brazil. Type (D) economy has poor flow and poor stock. Background Recently, the conflict between USA and anti-USA becomes harder. Above matrix shows the reasons. The matrix is moving as clockwise. For example, type (A) becomes type(B), type(B) becomes type(D), type(D) becomes type(C), and type(C) becomes type(A). Types are rotating as clockwise. Thoughts I thought that the key is whether type(B) becomes type(D) or not. When type(B) becomes type(D), other types becomes next types sooner or later. Mo...

“Nuclear Weapons Organization(NWO)” The world has to be ready for new era which is controlled by NWO, Nuclear Weapons Organization, not New World Order. Russia gov may use tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-sends-reinforcements-after-russian-forces-attack-kharkiv-region-2024-05-10/ It causes lower psychological hurdles to use nuclear weapons for current NWO members. And this will stimulate to other countries for increasing motivation to have own nuclear weapons. As a fact, Belarus has become a nuclear-armed state by Russia. In addition, when Russia economy is collapsed, the nuclear weapons Russia army has will spread to other countries. Other countries may be neighbor countries. I think that the world should increase members of NWO, otherwise NWO members will threaten other countries.

  “AND/OR strategy” “A and B” means both of A and B. “A or B” means only A or only B. “A and/or B” means both of A and B, only A or only B. If we use A “and” B, we choose both of A and B. If we use A “or” B, we choose one of A and B. If we use A “and/or” B, we choose “both of A and B” or “one of A and B”. In the history, weak countries had to choose A “or” B. Recently, weak countries can choose A “and/or” B, and I recommend  this “AND/OR strategy”. If weak countries choose USA side “or” China side, the world will be divided by 2 sides. Choosing USA side “and/or” China side may irritate USA and China governments. For this “and/or strategy”, weak countries have to recognize grouping power. Grouping power means weak solidarity by religious, cultures, and languages. Weak solidarity is not “alliance”. Important thing is to keep own distance from USA side or China side. I predict that if weak countries take this “and/or strategy”, weak countries can get big benef...