Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts with the label War

Next battle field will be …

  Next battle field will be … I saw this news with interesting mind. アングル:長期金利16年ぶり1.5%超、悪い金利上昇警戒 「防衛費」急浮上 https://jp.reuters.com/markets/treasury/PO7CJUOBJFOP3DAM7XJWYQMPNQ-2025-03-06/ This news tells Japan government to increase budget for Army. Next battle field will be South Korea and/or Taiwan which are near Japan. Why I think so is that there seems to be some patterns in what USA says. USA tends to tell some countries to increase self defense power before near country will be involved to war.

Images in Someone’s Brain

Images in Someone’s Brain I don’t write who someone is. I want below sentence is wrong. Someone’s army has very strong power in the world. But it is not useful in peace state. If Taiwan emergency happens, someone’s friend-like government will attack rich countries. Then the rich countries will call help to someone’s army. So that someone can deal with the rich countries. Someone wants to deal with rich countries in advantage position. Someone needs WW3 because of someone’s deals. Therefor, someone hurries up to make Taiwan emergency happen. This is just my opinion, and one small thought.

Two is more than One, USA and China is more than only USA

  Two is more than One, USA and China is more than only USA I watched this news. Trump and Zelenskiy clash, leaving Ukraine exposed in war with Russia https://www.reuters.com/world/trump-zelenskiy-sign-minerals-deal-white-house-meeting-2025-02-28/ If strong people, who doesn’t feel others’ pain, tries to deal with weak people, there will be tragedy. I wrote this, again. USA is not Leader, USA is only Dealer. I think that Ukraine will deal with China gov via EU govs for the war with Russia. USA and President Trump are too much pro-Russia, so that it is impossible to expect good and fair deal. China gov may want to control production amount of rare mineral resources. Further, EU govs want to get rare mineral resources in Ukraine. Two is more than One. USA and China is more than only USA. USA can’t control whole world. Furthermore, I am World Advisor.

Hierarchy minimizes conflict costs

  Hierarchy minimizes conflict costs I watched this news with very interesting mind. Trump’s new expansionist target: Gaza https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trumps-gaza-stunner-builds-his-expansionist-aims-2025-02-05/ I don’t say this President Trump’s saying is right or not. But I am interested in this idea for some reasons. (1)Why does the war happen in Middle East? Because there is no very strong military power. Of course, Israel has strong military power, but not enough when it is compared to other military powers in around countries. If there is outstanding military power, Middle East will be peace. Hierarchy minimizes conflict costs, this is rule in natural world. (2)What reactions will others do? I am interested in reactions of  other people, organizations and governments. This President Trump’s idea is extreme pro-Jewish, so that the reactions will be the litmus paper. The litmus paper reveals how much they like Jewish or don’t. (3)Where is USA’s int...

How to prevent USA’s the last move(Checkmate to start WW3) to China

  How to prevent USA’s the last move(Checkmate to start WW3) to China I thought about how to prevent USA’s the last move(Checkmate to start WW3) to China. First, what is the last move by USA to China? It is to recognize Taiwan’s independence to China. Then why will it to be checkmate to start WW3? Because I thought if Taiwan emergency by USA and China happens, Russia and North Korea will attack to South Korea and Japan. If Japan is attacked, Japan will start WW3. This is just my opinion, but not so far from truth. So what should we do for preventing USA’s the last move to China? I thought some options. Option A To defeat China economy before the last move. Option B To defeat USA economy before the last move. Option C To defeat both of USA and China before the last move. Option D To let both of USA and China win before the last move. These options are below matrix. USA/CHINA CHINA wins CHINA loses USA wins Option D Option A USA loses ...

Caution:Foreign intelligence agencies may work harder in Far East Asia

  Caution:Foreign intelligence agencies may work harder in Far East Asia I watched this Korea news. South Korean leader's security chief warns against violent attempts to arrest Yoon https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/south-korean-presidential-security-chief-appear-questioning-by-police-friday-2025-01-10/ Then I watched Japanese famous talent’s scandal. The scandal may be aimed to damage the conservative media Fuji-Sankei Holding. I don’t know what truth is. However, I think that both of the Korea news and the scandal news may be set up by foreign intelligence agencies. Because the timing was too good for some foreign governments, including Russia and North Korea. The relationship between Russia and North Korea may be deeper than I thought.

Warning to Iran:Don’t rush to the war

  Warning to Iran:Don’t rush to the war Some Iran people may read my blog. So that there is one warning. If you don’t have the solution which your enemy doesn’t think, don’t rush to war. Israel will keep on irritating Iran, but don’t let yourself rush to war. My idea I thought one idea for Iran. How about making Semi-alliance between Iran-North Korea-Pakistan?

TPP can stop the WW3

  TPP can stop the WW3 Background TPP(Trans-Pacific Partnership) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Pacific_Partnership TPP is the trade agreement around Pacific Rim. Background2 USA and China have the conflict between them. This conflict has possibility about WW3. Can USA vs China turn to be USA & China? I hope Yes. It will be solved by USA and China to join TPP at the same time. TPP has rules about the trade agreements. If USA rejoins the TPP, China will be denied to join the TPP. If China joins the TPP, USA will be denied to join the TPP. So that if USA and China join TPP at the same time, this problem will be solved. Then if USA want to leave TPP, USA can’t rejoin the TPP because of the presence of China. The reverse is also true. TPP can bring USA and China bigger trades. More abstracted TPP is one example. There are some rules about the group just like TPP. Both = USA and China (1)There are benefits for both countries by joining the group. (2)T...