How to improve Pawn promotion probability In my economic view, there are 3 types of economic companies. Pawn: Domestic companies which work in own countries Minor and Major pieces: Big companies which earn moneys in foreign countries King: Central centers in own countries Then, how to improve Pawn promotion probability? Supporting by Minor and Major pieces to Pawn may be good method. For example, if pawns in USA want to earn in China markets, supporting by Tesla, Microsoft and other Minor and Major pieces will be good. Conversely, if pawns in China want to earn in USA markets, supporting by Minor and Major pieces will be good. I recalled Mercari company’s fault. Mercari has tried to enter in USA markets only by itself, but it was failed. Because it had no support from minor and major pieces in Japan, such as TOYOTA or SoftBank.
2016/9/27 High Efficiency without effect: Poor strategy with great tactics
Strategy: Aiming to effect
Tactics: Improving efficiency
High efficiency without effect is this: Poor strategy with great tactics.
There are 4 patterns about strategy and tactics in economy.
1. Great strategy with great tactics. Excellent company.
2. Great strategy with poor tactics. Excellent company in bad terms.
3. Poor strategy with great tactics. Commodity company in good terms.
4. Poor strategy with poor tactics. Commodity company.
I think that the difference between excellent company and commodity company is the attitude to the effects or money.
Excellent company aims to get effects and gets money as the result.
Commodity company chases money.
It is hard to identify excellent company in bad terms and commodity company in good terms from outside.
If I meet to the commodity company in good terms, in fact the high efficiency without effect, I can learn the great tactics from that company.
Because that company has some great tactics.
Strategy: Aiming to effect
Tactics: Improving efficiency
High efficiency without effect is this: Poor strategy with great tactics.
There are 4 patterns about strategy and tactics in economy.
1. Great strategy with great tactics. Excellent company.
2. Great strategy with poor tactics. Excellent company in bad terms.
3. Poor strategy with great tactics. Commodity company in good terms.
4. Poor strategy with poor tactics. Commodity company.
I think that the difference between excellent company and commodity company is the attitude to the effects or money.
Excellent company aims to get effects and gets money as the result.
Commodity company chases money.
It is hard to identify excellent company in bad terms and commodity company in good terms from outside.
If I meet to the commodity company in good terms, in fact the high efficiency without effect, I can learn the great tactics from that company.
Because that company has some great tactics.
Comments
Post a Comment