Some Risks of China’s Dual-Use Export Ban China’s recent decision to impose a dual-use export ban targeting Japan is often discussed in terms of supply chains, technology controls, and security risks. However, beyond the immediate economic impact, this policy carries a less obvious but potentially more strategic risk : its indirect effects on Taiwan–Japan relations. This article explores three structural risks embedded in the design of the ban. 1. Taiwan-to-Japan exports may fall into a gray zone Although the export ban is formally directed only at Japan , its scope becomes ambiguous when Taiwan is involved. From China’s official perspective, Taiwan is not treated as a fully separate political entity. As a result, dual-use goods manufactured or exported from Taiwan—such as electronic components, semiconductor-related hardware, or even consumer-grade PC parts—can be framed as Chinese-origin technologies routed through Taiwan . This creates a situation where: • Taiwan exporting dual-...

New World Orders (NWO) in BPS The End of the King Role of the United States The United States has stepped down from the position of King , the role of rule-maker. Until recently, the U.S. occupied a dual position: King and Queen at the same time. Today, however, it functions primarily as a Queen alone . Once that shift occurred, the King role was not taken away by others — it expired automatically . In chess, the King is not defined by strength, but by legitimacy. When a player chooses speed, force, and unilateral action over restraint and shared rules, the King role disappears by definition. Without the King, What Happens to the World? Order is still necessary. A world without any governing structure does not become stable freedom; it becomes chaotic acceleration . Without a King, actions may remain logical and powerful, but they lose coordination, trust, and long-term sustainability. This is the condition the world is now facing. “New World Orders”, Not “New World Order” NWO does no...

IS Becomes WAS Introduction For a long time, the United States played two roles at once in the global system. It was both the King and the Queen . The King represents legitimacy, rules, and the position everyone instinctively protects. The Queen represents power, speed, and decisive action. For decades, America carried both roles simultaneously. But that balance appears to be breaking. From King and Queen to Queen Alone Until recently, the United States functioned not only as the most powerful actor, but also as the rule-maker of the international system. When America moved, allies followed. When America spoke, rules formed. That is the role of the King. Today, however, the United States increasingly looks like it is retaining only the role of the Queen . Powerful, fast, and capable of dramatic moves — but no longer the piece that others instinctively defend. This suggests that America may be losing its position as the shared rule-maker , even if its raw power remains intact. Venezue...